|
John Benny:
We may be one step ahead in that there are prescriptive levels of space per
group. We have also been driving a culture change over the last couple of years. The
customer is more engaged in making decisions for themselves. Everyone has his or her own
viewpoint on the best work environment. Once we meet the basics of being clean, well lit,
and a sufficient amount of space per person, we allow them the latitude to tailor their
space as they wish. It has allowed us to get the space per person down by trading off,
with their participation, on how the space gets planned. We have a standard that includes
common space and aisle ways. Our magic number includes support areas, coffee bars, etc.
Our list of constraints is less than a page and allows them to have flexibility.
We are
being watched from a financial standpoint on how we manage vacancies. There is a cost to
drive vacancy down to near zero. It requires continuous minor moves because we are always
chasing the vacant chair. What level of vacancy is good business practice, is
questionable.
|
 |
 |
|
John Benny:
We have an experiment in process in day care. We built two day care centers
that were immediately subscribed. That has been a part of the workplace change. We are
trying to break down functional alignment in our organizations and counter that with real
collaboration in a lot of different strategies. That’s not something you can do remotely
or electronically, you need to interact as much as you can. We are looking for the
synergy. In three years, we will have a much more flexible workplace that can continuously
change as the character of project teams change. We acknowledge that people who work in a
matrix organization work in more than one location, and will need more than one space.
|
 |
|